d***@yahoo.com
2008-05-06 16:02:16 UTC
In the timeframe from 04/2007 to 04/2008, http://siteanalytics.compete.com/superawos.com/
has received approximately 3 times as many website visits from unique
visitors versus
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digiwx.com/
With nearly twice as many actual airport installations, SuperAWOS is
the clear leader in UNICOM-based AWOS systems versus the dismal Digiwx
where Belfort Instruments counts both demo sites & actual airport
installations and lumps them into one category on their homepage under
"Installations." If this isn't disingenous (to say the least), then I
don't know what is.
Choose the LEADER (eg. SuperAWOS) or the laggard (eg. Digiwx) and get
what you pay for!
nota bene: I can now see Belfort Instruments owners (Bruce R.
Robinson, Nicholas C. Kaufman) and management (Mark W. Decker, Debra
S. Alascio, Ralph F. Petragnani, William C. Gordon) instructing all
employees (Tylor M. Burton III, Kelly Cole) to visit http://www.digiwx.com
to build up site visits from here on out. That's why this comparison
will be null and void from this date forward. But the past year
(04/2007 to 04/2008) does paint a telling story about how dismal
Belfort's Digiwx really is!
BTW: One should also wonder why Belfort Instruments installs many of
it's Digiwx AWOS out of the USA internationally versus domestically.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that foreign airports
have much less rigid standards (than the FAA) for setting-up,
operating and maintaining a Digiwx AWOS (Almost Weather Observation
System)? Can Digiwx AWOS cut the mustard here in the USA where
Belfort's "only" FAA commissioned Digiwx AWOS is "temporarily
unavailable" a good percentage of the time as noted at:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/0fce243569f52a1e
Care for some INFERIOR Chinese-made weather sensors on your Digiwx
AWOS: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/ac083f037d3fb7f8
And just "who" does maintain a dismal Digiwx AWOS:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/ab4dfef210ed6260
has received approximately 3 times as many website visits from unique
visitors versus
http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digiwx.com/
With nearly twice as many actual airport installations, SuperAWOS is
the clear leader in UNICOM-based AWOS systems versus the dismal Digiwx
where Belfort Instruments counts both demo sites & actual airport
installations and lumps them into one category on their homepage under
"Installations." If this isn't disingenous (to say the least), then I
don't know what is.
Choose the LEADER (eg. SuperAWOS) or the laggard (eg. Digiwx) and get
what you pay for!
nota bene: I can now see Belfort Instruments owners (Bruce R.
Robinson, Nicholas C. Kaufman) and management (Mark W. Decker, Debra
S. Alascio, Ralph F. Petragnani, William C. Gordon) instructing all
employees (Tylor M. Burton III, Kelly Cole) to visit http://www.digiwx.com
to build up site visits from here on out. That's why this comparison
will be null and void from this date forward. But the past year
(04/2007 to 04/2008) does paint a telling story about how dismal
Belfort's Digiwx really is!
BTW: One should also wonder why Belfort Instruments installs many of
it's Digiwx AWOS out of the USA internationally versus domestically.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that foreign airports
have much less rigid standards (than the FAA) for setting-up,
operating and maintaining a Digiwx AWOS (Almost Weather Observation
System)? Can Digiwx AWOS cut the mustard here in the USA where
Belfort's "only" FAA commissioned Digiwx AWOS is "temporarily
unavailable" a good percentage of the time as noted at:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/0fce243569f52a1e
Care for some INFERIOR Chinese-made weather sensors on your Digiwx
AWOS: http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/ac083f037d3fb7f8
And just "who" does maintain a dismal Digiwx AWOS:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.products/msg/ab4dfef210ed6260